↓ Skip to main content

Which is the dominant factor for perception of rheumatic pain: meteorology or psychology?

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Which is the dominant factor for perception of rheumatic pain: meteorology or psychology?
Published in
Rheumatology International, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00296-009-1279-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hasan Fatih Çay, Ilhan Sezer, Mehmet Z. Firat, Cahit Kaçar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Psychology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2011.
All research outputs
#12,929,609
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#1,192
of 2,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,308
of 163,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.