↓ Skip to main content

The role of context specificity in learning: the effects of training context on explosives detection in dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
The role of context specificity in learning: the effects of training context on explosives detection in dogs
Published in
Animal Cognition, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10071-004-0236-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irit Gazit, Allen Goldblatt, Joseph Terkel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 118 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Other 16 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 11%
Psychology 14 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2009.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#977
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,851
of 60,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.