↓ Skip to main content

Single-molecule protein folding: Diffusion fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of the denaturation of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
431 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single-molecule protein folding: Diffusion fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of the denaturation of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2000
DOI 10.1073/pnas.090104997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashok A. Deniz, Ted A. Laurence, Gangamani S. Beligere, Maxime Dahan, Andrew B. Martin, Daniel S. Chemla, Philip E. Dawson, Peter G. Schultz, Shimon Weiss

Abstract

We report single-molecule folding studies of a small, single-domain protein, chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 (CI2). CI2 is an excellent model system for protein folding studies and has been extensively studied, both experimentally (at the ensemble level) and theoretically. Conformationally assisted ligation methodology was used to synthesize the proteins and site-specifically label them with donor and acceptor dyes. Folded and denatured subpopulations were observed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements on freely diffusing single protein molecules. Properties of these subpopulations were directly monitored as a function of guanidinium chloride concentration. It is shown that new information about different aspects of the protein folding reaction can be extracted from such subpopulation properties. Shifts in the mean transfer efficiencies are discussed, FRET efficiency distributions are translated into potentials, and denaturation curves are directly plotted from the areas of the FRET peaks. Changes in stability caused by mutation also are measured by comparing pseudo wild-type CI2 with a destabilized mutant (K17G). Current limitations and future possibilities and prospects for single-pair FRET protein folding investigations are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 289 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 27%
Researcher 65 21%
Student > Master 32 10%
Professor 30 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 8%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 33 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 23%
Physics and Astronomy 65 21%
Chemistry 63 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 13%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 42 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,219,054
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64,491
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,465
of 40,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#279
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.