| Title |
On the syntax of disjunction scope
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, May 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00133841 |
| Authors |
Richard K. Larson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Uganda | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 59 | 83% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2013.
All research outputs
#12,929,609
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#118
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,977
of 9,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.