| Title |
Tissue parameters determining the visual appearance of normal skin and port-wine stains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lasers in Medical Science, March 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02133165 |
| Authors |
L. O. Svaasand, L. T. Norvang, E. J. Fiskerstrand, E. K. S. Stopps, M. W. Berns, J. S. Nelson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Latvia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 21 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,061,402 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#284
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,545
of 24,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,061,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them