| Title |
Constitutive relationship of a material with unconventional Poisson's ratio
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science Letters, December 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:jmsl.0000005420.34383.d8 |
| Authors |
Teik-Cheng Lim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 37% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 37% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#109
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,085
of 142,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.