↓ Skip to main content

Human CD34− Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Basic Features and Clinical Relevance

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Human CD34− Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Basic Features and Clinical Relevance
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, May 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf02982126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiyoshi Ando

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 4 31%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#263
of 1,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,019
of 121,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.