| Title |
An RCAS-TVA-based approach to designer mouse models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammalian Genome, October 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00335-002-4003-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Orsulic |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Gambia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 31% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2009.
All research outputs
#7,560,078
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#319
of 1,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,800
of 46,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.