↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation ofKIc of brittle solids by the indentation method with low crack-to-indent ratios

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science Letters, January 1982
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1614 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation ofKIc of brittle solids by the indentation method with low crack-to-indent ratios
Published in
Journal of Materials Science Letters, January 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00724706
Authors

K. Niihara, R. Morena, D. P. H. Hasselman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 355 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 26%
Student > Master 61 17%
Researcher 46 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 5%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 71 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 146 40%
Engineering 78 21%
Chemical Engineering 9 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 99 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,149,272
of 24,688,240 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#107
of 591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,820
of 31,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science Letters
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,688,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 591 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them