↓ Skip to main content

Effect of built-in bias fields on the nanoscale switching in ferroelectric thin films

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Effect of built-in bias fields on the nanoscale switching in ferroelectric thin films
Published in
Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00339-003-2348-5
Authors

D. Fu, K. Suzuki, K. Kato, H. Suzuki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 44%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 3 33%
Physics and Astronomy 2 22%
Engineering 2 22%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2009.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
#466
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,441
of 159,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.