You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intensive care diaries reduce new onset post traumatic stress disorder following critical illness: a randomised, controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc9260 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Jones, Carl Bäckman, Maurizia Capuzzo, Ingrid Egerod, Hans Flaatten, Cristina Granja, Christian Rylander, Richard D Griffiths, the RACHEL group |
| Abstract |
Patients recovering from critical illness have been shown to be at risk of developing Post Traumatic Stress disorder (PTSD). This study was to evaluate whether a prospectively collected diary of a patient's intensive care unit (ICU) stay when used during convalescence following critical illness will reduce the development of new onset PTSD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 21% |
| Spain | 12 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 10% |
| Argentina | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 23% |
| Scientists | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 339 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 14% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 86 | 24% |
| Unknown | 64 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 80 | 23% |
| Psychology | 21 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Unknown | 78 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2021.
All research outputs
#395,068
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#210
of 6,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,009
of 109,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.