↓ Skip to main content

A Two-Step Sol–Gel Method for Synthesis of Nanoporous TiO2

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Two-Step Sol–Gel Method for Synthesis of Nanoporous TiO2
Published in
Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, March 2004
DOI 10.1166/jnn.2004.037
Pubmed ID
Authors

I Kartini, P Meredith, X S Zhao, J C da Costa, G Q Lu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 29%
Chemical Engineering 3 18%
Materials Science 3 18%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
#274
of 1,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,415
of 63,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,525 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.