↓ Skip to main content

Cyclic peptides and depsipeptides from cyanobacteria: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Cyclic peptides and depsipeptides from cyanobacteria: A review
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, February 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01570074
Pubmed ID
Authors

R E Moore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 30%
Chemistry 22 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Environmental Science 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#575
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,408
of 81,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.