↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory mutations that allow the growth ofEscherichia coli on butanol as carbon source

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, June 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Regulatory mutations that allow the growth ofEscherichia coli on butanol as carbon source
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, June 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf02101757
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Clark, Margot L. Rod

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 57%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Chemistry 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2009.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#457
of 1,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,435
of 12,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.