Title |
Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 1997
|
DOI | 10.1007/s001670050061 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
L. Hangody, G. Kish, Z. Kárpáti, I. Szerb, I. Udvarhelyi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 3% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 134 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 22% |
Researcher | 20 | 14% |
Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 18% |
Unknown | 24 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 38% |
Engineering | 22 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Unknown | 31 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,155
of 2,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,844
of 30,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.