| Title |
A case of necrotizing sclerokeratitis and endophthalmitis caused by Beauveria bassiana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10384-009-0715-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joo Youn Oh, Min Joung Lee, Won Ryang Wee, Jang Won Heo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 33% |
| Researcher | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,462,560
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#63
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,435
of 91,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.