| Title |
Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, May 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-002-1377-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfgang Luboldt, Carolin Mann, Cathy L. Tryon, Reinhard Vonthein, Dietmar Stueker, Manuela Kroll, Oliver Luz, Claus D. Claussen, Thomas J. Vogl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 29% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2007.
All research outputs
#4,916,068
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#645
of 4,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,679
of 122,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.