| Title |
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of the phytopathogenic fungus Penicillium digitatum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1631/jzus.b0860006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji-ye Wang, Hong-ye Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,685,999
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#191
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,060
of 102,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.