↓ Skip to main content

Inactivation of Baculovirus by Isoflavonoids on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Leaf Surfaces Reduces the Efficacy of Nucleopolyhedrovirus Against Helicoverpa armigera

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Inactivation of Baculovirus by Isoflavonoids on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Leaf Surfaces Reduces the Efficacy of Nucleopolyhedrovirus Against Helicoverpa armigera
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10886-010-9748-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip C. Stevenson, Reju F. D’Cunha, David Grzywacz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Researcher 5 18%
Professor 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Engineering 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,462,560
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#635
of 2,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,346
of 166,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.