| Title |
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation ofMucor circinelloides
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Microbiologica, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02931423 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
I. Nyilasi, K. Ács, T. Papp, E. Nagy, C. Vágvölgyi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,462,560
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#126
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,413
of 58,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.