↓ Skip to main content

Controversial evaluation of EGFR protein and gene status in predicting response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Targeted Oncology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Controversial evaluation of EGFR protein and gene status in predicting response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a case report and review of the literature
Published in
Targeted Oncology, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11523-008-0073-x
Authors

Mauro Moroni, Silvio Veronese, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Salvatore Artale, Salvatore Siena

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2009.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Targeted Oncology
#130
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,535
of 80,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Targeted Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them