↓ Skip to main content

The Evolution of Endogenous Viral Elements

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Host & Microbe (Science Direct), October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
81 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Evolution of Endogenous Viral Elements
Published in
Cell Host & Microbe (Science Direct), October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.chom.2011.09.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward C. Holmes

Abstract

Endogenous retroviruses are a common component of the eukaryotic genome, and their evolution and potential function have attracted considerable interest. More surprising was the recent discovery that eukaryotic genomes contain sequences from RNA viruses that have no DNA stage in their life cycle. Similarly, several single-stranded DNA viruses have left integrated copies in their host genomes. This review explores some major evolutionary aspects arising from the discovery of these endogenous viral elements (EVEs). In particular, the reasons for the bias toward EVEs derived from negative-sense RNA viruses are considered, as well as what they tell us about the long-term "arms races" between hosts and viruses, characterized by episodes of selection and counter-selection. Most dramatically, the presence of orthologous EVEs in divergent hosts demonstrates that some viral families have ancestries dating back almost 100 million years, and hence are far older than expected from the phylogenetic analysis of their exogenous relatives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Brazil 3 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 315 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 21%
Researcher 70 21%
Student > Bachelor 48 14%
Student > Master 42 13%
Professor 16 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 42 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 4%
Environmental Science 5 1%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 53 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2023.
All research outputs
#584,039
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell Host & Microbe (Science Direct)
#440
of 2,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,159
of 150,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Host & Microbe (Science Direct)
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.