↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Device

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
81 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
309 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Device
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00128071-200506030-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark L. Venturi, Christopher E. Attinger, Ali N. Mesbahi, Christopher L. Hess, Katherine S. Graw

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 172 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Other 17 10%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 42%
Engineering 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Materials Science 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 53 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#568
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,543
of 186,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#141
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.