| Title |
Reductive cleavage of tetanus toxin and botulinum neurotoxin A by the thioredoxin system from brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, February 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00165741 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Kistner, E. Habermann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
| Engineering | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,288,634
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#89
of 1,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,413
of 61,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,731 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them