↓ Skip to main content

Qscore: An algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
340 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Qscore: An algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, April 2002
DOI 10.1016/s1044-0305(02)00352-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger E. Moore, Mary K. Young, Terry D. Lee

Abstract

A scoring procedure is described for measuring the quality of the results for protein identifications obtained from spectral matching of MS/MS data using the Sequest database search program. The scoring system is essentially probabilistic and operates by estimating the probability that a protein identification has come about by chance. The probability is based on the number of identified peptides from the protein, the total number of identified peptides, and the fraction of distinct tryptic peptides from the database that are present in the identified protein. The score is not strictly a probability, as it also incorporates information about the quality of the individual peptide matches. The result of using Qscore on a large test set of data was similar to that achieved using approaches that validate individual spectral matches, with only a narrow overlap in scores between identified proteins and false positive matches. In direct comparison with a published method of evaluating Sequest results, Qscore was able to identify an equivalent number of proteins without any identifiable false positive assignments. Qscore greatly reduces the number of Sequest protein identifications that have to be validated manually.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
Turkey 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 110 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 23%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 19%
Computer Science 15 12%
Chemistry 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 17 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2009.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#555
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,326
of 128,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.