↓ Skip to main content

Newton polygons arising from special families of cyclic covers of the projective line

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Newton polygons arising from special families of cyclic covers of the projective line
Published in
arXiv, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40993-018-0149-3
Authors

Wanlin Li, Elena Mantovan, Rachel Pries, Yunqing Tang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,575,287
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#459,025
of 990,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,401
of 442,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#12,695
of 24,425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24,425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.