↓ Skip to main content

Management of knee dislocation prior to ligament reconstruction: What is the current evidence? Update of a universal treatment algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Management of knee dislocation prior to ligament reconstruction: What is the current evidence? Update of a universal treatment algorithm
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00590-018-2148-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Maslaris, Olaf Brinkmann, Matthias Bungartz, Christian Krettek, Michael Jagodzinski, Emmanouil Liodakis

Abstract

Traumatic knee dislocation is a rare but potentially limb-threatening injury. Thus proper initial diagnosis and treatment up to final ligament reconstruction are extremely important and a precondition to successful outcomes. Reports suggest that evidence-based systematic approaches lead to better results. Because of the complexity of this injury and the inhomogeneity of related literature, there are still various controversies and knowledge gaps regarding decision-making and step-sequencing in the treatment of acute multi-ligament knee injuries and knee dislocations. The use of ankle-brachial index, routine or selective angiography, braces, joint-spanning or dynamic external fixation, and the necessity of initial ligament re-fixation during acute surgery constitutes current topics of a scholarly debate. The aim of this article was to provide a comprehensive literature review bringing light into some important aspects about the initial treatment of knee dislocation (vascular injury, neural injury, immobilization techniques) and finally develop an accurate data-based universal algorithm, enabling attending physicians to become more acquainted with the management of acute knee dislocation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Other 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 33 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Unspecified 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 38 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,356,828
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#59
of 895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,590
of 331,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 895 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.