↓ Skip to main content

Fast and Versatile Multiscale Patterning by Combining Template-Stripping with Nanotransfer Printing

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Nano, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fast and Versatile Multiscale Patterning by Combining Template-Stripping with Nanotransfer Printing
Published in
ACS Nano, February 2018
DOI 10.1021/acsnano.7b08290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael F. Tiefenauer, Klas Tybrandt, Morteza Aramesh, János Vörös

Abstract

Metal nanostructures are widely used in plasmonic and electronic applications due to their inherent properties. Often, the fabrication of such nanostructures is limited to small areas, as the processing is costly, low-throughput, and comprises harsh fabrication conditions. Here, we introduce a template-stripping based nanotransfer printing method to overcome these limitations. This versatile technique enables the transfer of arbitrary thin film metal structures onto a variety of substrates, including glass, Kapton, silicon, and PDMS. Structures can range from tens of nanometers to hundreds of micrometers over a wafer scale area. The process is organic solvent-free, multilayer compatible, and only takes minutes to perform. The stability of the transferred gold structures on glass exceeds by far those fabricated by e-beam evaporation. Therefore, an adhesion layer is no longer needed, enabling a faster and cheaper fabrication as well as the production of superior nanostructures. Structures can be transferred onto curved substrates, and the technique is compatible with roll-to-roll fabrication; thus, the process is suitable for flexible and stretchable electronics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 35%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 24 30%
Materials Science 18 23%
Physics and Astronomy 7 9%
Chemistry 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,518,558
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from ACS Nano
#10,288
of 12,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,071
of 330,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Nano
#187
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.