↓ Skip to main content

Guano as a nitrogen source for fertigation in organic farming

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, February 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Guano as a nitrogen source for fertigation in organic farming
Published in
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, February 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01063294
Authors

A. Hadas, R. Rosenberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 41%
Environmental Science 6 15%
Engineering 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#163
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,509
of 61,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.