↓ Skip to main content

Multifaceted roles of HSF1 in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Multifaceted roles of HSF1 in cancer
Published in
Tumor Biology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3674-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sufang Jiang, Kailing Tu, Qiang Fu, David C. Schmitt, Lan Zhou, Na Lu, Yuhua Zhao

Abstract

Heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) is the master regulator of the heat shock response. Accumulating evidence shows that HSF1 is overexpressed in a variety of human cancers, is associated with cancer aggressiveness, and could serve as an independent diagnostic or prognostic biomarker. In this review, we will provide an overview of the multifaceted roles of HSF1 in cancer, with a special focus on the four underlying molecular mechanisms involved. First, HSF1 regulates the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) including HSP90, HSP70, and HSP27. Second, HSF1 regulates cellular metabolism, including glycolysis and lipid metabolism. Third, HSF1 serves as a regulator of different signaling pathways, such as HuR-HIF-1, Slug, protein kinase C (PKC), nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB), PI3K-AKT-mTOR, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. Finally, HSF1 regulates microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). Overall, HSF1 plays many important roles in cancer via regulating cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), migration, invasion, and metastasis and may be a potential therapeutic target for human cancers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,417,643
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,369
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,533
of 263,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#71
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.