| Title |
Arthroscopic autologous condrocyte transplantation: technical note
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-001-0275-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Marcacci, S. Zaffagnini, E. Kon, A. Visani, F. Iacono, I. Loreti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 28% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2011.
All research outputs
#4,767,124
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#630
of 2,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,537
of 124,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.