| Title |
Relevant aspects in the clinical applications of NiTi shape memory alloys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, July 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00122008 |
| Authors |
F. X. Gil, J. M. Manero, J. A. Planell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 64% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 5 | 36% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 21% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2010.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#316
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,336
of 29,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.