| Title |
Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s005860100315 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
U. Schick, J. Döhnert, A. Richter, A. König, H. Vitzthum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 45% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,782,616
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#553
of 4,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,133
of 38,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.