↓ Skip to main content

Detection of Dirofilaria immitis DNA in host serum by nested PCR

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Detection of Dirofilaria immitis DNA in host serum by nested PCR
Published in
Parasitology Research, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4591-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaaki Oi, Yukita Sato, Kazuhide Nakagaki, Sadao Nogami

Abstract

The heartworm Dirofilaria immitis is the causative agent of dirofilariasis in dogs. Studies have shown that parasite-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can be detected in host blood and may be a promising diagnostic marker for parasitic infections. Thus, our aim was to detect D. immitis-derived cfDNA in host serum by nested PCR. Sera were collected from 12 dogs with natural D. immitis infections; eight were microfilaria (mf)-positive, and the remaining four were mf-negative. Culture fluids derived from single-sex adult D. immitis worms (mf-producing females and males) were also tested for cfDNA. All mf-positive sera were positive by nested PCR, whereas no amplification products were detected in mf-negative sera. The culture fluid of mf-producing females was positive by nested PCR but that of males was negative. All products amplified by nested PCR were sequenced to confirm that the amplicons were those of D. immitis. These results indicate that D. immitis DNA circulates freely in dog serum, except in mf-negative dogs. Additionally, D. immitis cfDNA may primarily be derived from the mf, and adult worms appeared to be minor contributors of cfDNA concentrations in serum; however, the contribution of D. immitis cfDNA derived from larvae of other developmental stages is unclear. An evaluation of the kinetics of D. immitis cfDNA in host serum throughout the parasite life cycle could facilitate the development of early molecular diagnostic techniques. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the detection of mitochondrial DNA from a filarial parasite in host serum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,230,708
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#1,513
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,521
of 263,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#24
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.