↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of omental implantation for perforated gastric ulcer therapy: Findings in a rat model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of omental implantation for perforated gastric ulcer therapy: Findings in a rat model
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02358602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasunori Matoba, Hironori Katayama, Hiroshi Ohami

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2011.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#306
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,822
of 29,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.