↓ Skip to main content

Chemolithoutotrophic growth of Thiothrix ramosa

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Chemolithoutotrophic growth of Thiothrix ramosa
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, August 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00288718
Authors

Elena V. Odintsova, Ann P. Wood, Don P. Kelly

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#573
of 2,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,892
of 20,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.