| Title |
Indications, management, and complications of temporary inferior vena cava filters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, November 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002709900305 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ulrich Linsenmaier, Johannes Rieger, Franz Schenk, Clemens Rock, Eugen Mangel, Klaus Jürgen Pfeifer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,744,540
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#686
of 2,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,680
of 35,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them