| Title |
Macroporous alumina monoliths prepared by filling polymer foams with alumina hydrosols
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-008-3189-6 |
| Authors |
Yuan Zhang, Hao Liang, Cun Yu Zhao, Yuan Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 29% |
| Researcher | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 17 | 38% |
| Materials Science | 13 | 29% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,013
of 171,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.