↓ Skip to main content

Role of cytochrome P450 2C8*3 (CYP2C8*3) in paclitaxel metabolism and paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacogenomics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of cytochrome P450 2C8*3 (CYP2C8*3) in paclitaxel metabolism and paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity
Published in
Pharmacogenomics, June 2015
DOI 10.2217/pgs.15.46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mi-Young Lee, Mara Apellniz-Ruiz, Inger Johansson, Svante Vikingsson, Troels K Bergmann, Kim Brsen, Henrik Green, Cristina Rodrguez-Antona, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg

Abstract

The CYP2C8*3 allele has been suggested as a risk factor for paclitaxel-induced neuropathy but the data hitherto published are conflicting. In total 435 patients were investigated with respect to maximum neuropathy grade and accumulated paclitaxel dose. The enzymatic properties of CYP2C8.3 variant were analyzed using heterologous mammalian HEK293 cell expression system. No significant association between CYP2C8*3 allele and neuropathy was found, although a trend was observed. The paclitaxel and amodiaquine metabolism by CYP2C8.3 were found similar to CYP2C8.1, whereas CYP2C8.3 was more efficient in the metabolism of rosiglitazone. These results indicate a difference in substrate specificity between CYP2C8.1 and CYP2C8.3; however, the CYP2C8*3 allele has no major impact on paclitaxel metabolism in vitro or of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in vivo. Original submitted on 6 February 2015; revision submitted on 9 April 2015.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 35%