↓ Skip to main content

Bone tissue engineering with porous hydroxyapatite ceramics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Artificial Organs, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
28 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
326 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bone tissue engineering with porous hydroxyapatite ceramics
Published in
Journal of Artificial Organs, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10047-005-0292-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideki Yoshikawa, Akira Myoui

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 246 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 22%
Student > Master 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 48 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 55 21%
Materials Science 54 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Chemistry 15 6%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 62 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Artificial Organs
#64
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,956
of 69,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Artificial Organs
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.