Title |
Neglected questions in job design: How people design jobs, task-job predictability, and influence of training
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Business and Psychology, December 1991
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01126707 |
Authors |
Michael A. Campion, Michael J. Stevens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 33% |
Psychology | 11 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,655,245
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Psychology
#112
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,462
of 61,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Psychology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them