↓ Skip to main content

The potential for chemical mixtures from the environment to enable the cancer hallmark of sustained proliferative signalling

Overview of attention for article published in Carcinogenesis, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential for chemical mixtures from the environment to enable the cancer hallmark of sustained proliferative signalling
Published in
Carcinogenesis, June 2015
DOI 10.1093/carcin/bgv030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilhelm Engström, Philippa Darbre, Staffan Eriksson, Linda Gulliver, Tove Hultman, Michalis V Karamouzis, James E Klaunig, Rekha Mehta, Kim Moorwood, Thomas Sanderson, Hideko Sone, Pankaj Vadgama, Gerard Wagemaker, Andrew Ward, Neetu Singh, Fahd Al-Mulla, Rabeah Al-Temaimi, Amedeo Amedei, Anna Maria Colacci, Monica Vaccari, Chiara Mondello, A Ivana Scovassi, Jayadev Raju, Roslida A Hamid, Lorenzo Memeo, Stefano Forte, Rabindra Roy, Jordan Woodrick, Hosni K Salem, Elizabeth P Ryan, Dustin G Brown, William H Bisson

Abstract

The aim of this work is to review current knowledge relating the established cancer hallmark, sustained cell proliferation to the existence of chemicals present as low dose mixtures in the environment. Normal cell proliferation is under tight control, i.e. cells respond to a signal to proliferate, and although most cells continue to proliferate into adult life, the multiplication ceases once the stimulatory signal disappears or if the cells are exposed to growth inhibitory signals. Under such circumstances, normal cells remain quiescent until they are stimulated to resume further proliferation. In contrast, tumour cells are unable to halt proliferation, either when subjected to growth inhibitory signals or in the absence of growth stimulatory signals. Environmental chemicals with carcinogenic potential may cause sustained cell proliferation by interfering with some cell proliferation control mechanisms committing cells to an indefinite proliferative span.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 27%
Professor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,764,580
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Carcinogenesis
#4,120
of 4,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,061
of 263,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carcinogenesis
#31
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.