↓ Skip to main content

A Solvent-Free Method for Isotopically or Radioactively Labeling Cyclodextrins and Cyclodextrin-Containing Polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Bioconjugate Chemistry, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
18 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Solvent-Free Method for Isotopically or Radioactively Labeling Cyclodextrins and Cyclodextrin-Containing Polymers
Published in
Bioconjugate Chemistry, October 2006
DOI 10.1021/bc060211e
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan K. Zeidan, Stacey A. Kalovidouris, Thomas Schluep, Robert Fazio, Robert Andresini, Mark E. Davis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Chemical Engineering 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,729,343
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Bioconjugate Chemistry
#2,325
of 4,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,417
of 69,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioconjugate Chemistry
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.