↓ Skip to main content

Drying of water treatment process sludge in a fluidized bed dryer

Overview of attention for article published in Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Drying of water treatment process sludge in a fluidized bed dryer
Published in
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02789248
Authors

Yong-Seop Shin, Hee Chul Kim, Hai Soo Chun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 29%
Chemical Engineering 1 14%
Energy 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,561,005
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#65
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,471
of 108,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them