↓ Skip to main content

Bringing Clay and Sand into Digital Design — Continuous Tangible user Interfaces

Overview of attention for article published in BT Technology Journal, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 110)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Bringing Clay and Sand into Digital Design — Continuous Tangible user Interfaces
Published in
BT Technology Journal, October 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:bttj.0000047607.16164.16
Authors

H Ishii, C Ratti, B Piper, Y Wang, A Biderman, E Ben-Joseph

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 6%
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 140 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 24%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 77 46%
Design 32 19%
Engineering 15 9%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 21 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BT Technology Journal
#30
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,473
of 75,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BT Technology Journal
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.