Title |
Bringing Clay and Sand into Digital Design — Continuous Tangible user Interfaces
|
---|---|
Published in |
BT Technology Journal, October 2004
|
DOI | 10.1023/b:bttj.0000047607.16164.16 |
Authors |
H Ishii, C Ratti, B Piper, Y Wang, A Biderman, E Ben-Joseph |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 6% |
Germany | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 140 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 44 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 24% |
Researcher | 23 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 77 | 46% |
Design | 32 | 19% |
Engineering | 15 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BT Technology Journal
#30
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,473
of 75,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BT Technology Journal
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.