↓ Skip to main content

Too old for IVF: are we discriminating against older women?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Too old for IVF: are we discriminating against older women?
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10815-007-9182-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norbert Gleicher, Andrea Weghofer, David Barad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 22%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#474
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,013
of 162,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.