↓ Skip to main content

Dry microfoams: formation and flow in a confined channel

Overview of attention for article published in Journal de Physique I, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Dry microfoams: formation and flow in a confined channel
Published in
Journal de Physique I, May 2006
DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00197-6
Authors

J.-P. Raven, P. Marmottant, F. Graner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Indonesia 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
India 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 30%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 32%
Physics and Astronomy 9 17%
Chemical Engineering 4 8%
Mathematics 3 6%
Materials Science 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#8,674,193
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#372
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,877
of 87,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them