You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults and Adolescents With Early-Onset Hearing Loss
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ear and hearing (Print), March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1097/aud.0b013e31822eb16c |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea Caposecco, Louise Hickson, Karen Pedley |
Abstract |
The aims of the study were to investigate (1) speech perception outcomes in people with an early-onset hearing loss (HL) who received a cochlear implant as an adolescent or adult, (2) prognostic factors associated with positive speech perception outcomes, and (3) self-report outcomes in these participants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 97 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 37% |
Psychology | 10 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,388,865
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#803
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,992
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.