↓ Skip to main content

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults and Adolescents With Early-Onset Hearing Loss

Overview of attention for article published in Ear and hearing (Print), March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults and Adolescents With Early-Onset Hearing Loss
Published in
Ear and hearing (Print), March 2012
DOI 10.1097/aud.0b013e31822eb16c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Caposecco, Louise Hickson, Karen Pedley

Abstract

The aims of the study were to investigate (1) speech perception outcomes in people with an early-onset hearing loss (HL) who received a cochlear implant as an adolescent or adult, (2) prognostic factors associated with positive speech perception outcomes, and (3) self-report outcomes in these participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 37%
Psychology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,388,865
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#803
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,992
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.