Title |
Assessing the potential for reverse colonization among Japanese birds by mining DNA barcode data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10336-015-1247-9 |
Authors |
Isao Nishiumi, Chang-Hoe Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
Researcher | 3 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 53% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,338,777
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#1,371
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,229
of 264,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#38
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.