↓ Skip to main content

Goal-Striving Stress Is Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease Among Participants in the Jackson Heart Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Goal-Striving Stress Is Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease Among Participants in the Jackson Heart Study
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40615-018-0499-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Loretta R. Cain, LáShauntá Glover, Bessie Young, Mario Sims

Abstract

Research that assesses the relationship between psychosocial factors and chronic kidney disease (CKD) among African Americans (AAs) is limited. Using the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) cohort data, we investigated the association of goal-striving stress (GSS)-the stress experienced from not reaching goals-with prevalent CKD among AAs. This was a cross-sectional analysis of JHS exam 1 data that assessed the relationship between GSS and CKD. We utilized a sample from the JHS (n = 4967), an AA sample of women and men, 35-84 years old from the Jackson, MS metro area. The baseline relationship between GSS levels (low, moderate, and high) and CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2) was evaluated using a logistic regression model to estimate odds ratios (OR) on a 95% confidence interval (CI). The final model was adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic status, health behaviors, risk factors, and total stress. After full adjustment, the odds of prevalent CKD increased by 52% (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.04, 2.24) for those reporting high (versus low) GSS. Deficiencies between goal aspiration and achievement were associated with prevalent CKD. Potential interventions might consider the impact GSS contributes to prevalent CKD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Materials Science 3 13%
Psychology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,241,330
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#266
of 1,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,003
of 330,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.